Sunday, September 19, 2010

Council cabal

    
View Larger Map


Don't look now, but the nine-member county council is about to be taken over by a neighborhood gang that is as scary as any you've seen hangin' in Downtown Silver Spring.


They go by Elrich, Ervin, Leventhal and Riemer, but are also sometimes known by their first names -- Marc, Val, George and Hans. Ay-yi-yi! Just hearing those monikers makes me want to hide way up in an old oak in Takoma Park -- preferably one that won't snap in the next storm.


These bangers all live in the same 'hood, so naturally they're going to put the 'hood's interests first and the rest of the county -- Damascus, G'burg, Germantown, Laytonsville, Washington Grove, Boyds, y'know, the upcounty -- second, or even third. Whatever spot those locales will occupy in the cabal's black heart, it will be tiny. Teensy-weentsy. Undetectable, unless you've got a laparascope. (The map above shows where they live--Leventhal and Elrich are in the city of Takoma Park; Ervin and Riemer are close by but in unincorporated Silver Spring.)


Surely you jest, you say. Montgomery County is the home of good government. Never would our county allow such favoritism, simply because these four live within biking distance of one another. Would it?


Ah, but that's exactly what the wise Democrats of voting age have done. Yup, all 20 percent of them. I know because I read it in the newspaper -- the Washington Post, to be exact. (Primary election results)


But wait a second. Why should I be afraid? After all, these four politicians are going to do my bidding. I live here in the People's Republic and they all live nearby, so that means my fellow citizens and I will reap the benefits of their representation.


Right?


Well, probably not. Three of the four have been on the council for four years, and Takoma Park is still getting short-changed on the "police rebate" the county gives us. The latest budget cycle had city leaders quaking in their boots, as county staffers proposed a draconian 25 percent cut. It was whittled down to half that, and the city ended up sacking a few folks. Not great for them, of course, but not as bad as it could have been. (Lest you think I'm callous, allow me to note that hardly anyone in this union-friendly town raised a peep about the dismissal of city workers. Lately, some of my fellow now-defunct-Task Force on Environmental Action members have been wondering why the city has hired a "social media" coordinator instead of saving the dough for a sustainability coordinator. The answer: The position was already budgeted. Oh, well -- that makes sense.) 


But back to the subject at hand, which is the windfall we in the PRoTP are sure to receive because we've got all these council people living near us. As former mayoral candidate and ubiquitous city activist and pain-in-the-rear (in a good way) Seth Grimes opines below,
"Marc, George, and Valerie have done nothing in their 4 years on the council to push the county executive to address widely acknowledged unfairness in the county's 'tax duplication' formulas by which the county keeps a disproportionate share of taxes paid by local residents that should be going to pay for services in Takoma Park... but doesn't. I'd be very surprised (but quite happy) if our county reps do pick up on this issue in the next 4 years."
Da Post


Before I begin what will only be the first of many (well-intentioned and well-informed) screeds against the Washington Post, allow me to state my bona fides. One thing you are not permitted to do in Takoma Park is criticize without first enumerating the many ways in which you are qualified to state an opinion. For instance, if I say the tree ordinance is irrational, I should first say that I love trees and would lay down my life for a Sweet Gum even if it were occupied by a family of tent caterpillars (which ain't so bad, btw). By the time you're done saying why your plaint should be listened to, however, you're usually out of time or the other person has burst in with a diatribe about your emotional immaturity.

So let me just say I grew up with the Post and remember well the days of ace photog Richard Darcey (Charley Taylor in full sprint, a Cowboy stretched helplessly in mid-air behind him in the Skins' 26-3 NFC championship win in 1972), the late but prolifically great Ward Sinclair (ag beat, Truckpatch), Dave Kindred, Ken Denlinger, Shirley Povich (last Nats game? I was there; he wrote it up); Lou Cannon, Michael Kernan (hilarious story on the White House turkey), David Remnick, David Maraniss (is he still there?), Phil McCombs ("Oh, Man!" was one of the best features ever to run in Style), and pugilist Henry Allen. 


Martie Zad, I remember the time we met at the Chevy Chase Lounge. Mike Abramowitz, I know you went to Alban's. Michael Dobbs? I hope the second edition of your Cuban Missile Crisis book gets my Dad's name right. Bob Woodward? I know you raised hackles with your stories on the school system when you were at the Montgomery County Sentinel. Margaret Webb? Before you latched onto the Haft family tragedy, I edited your stuff at the Gazette.


I paid 80 cents a day for the paper when I lived in Carlisle, Pa., and more on Sunday -- a good chunk of my measly reporter's salary. My father wrote dozens of letters and even a few op-eds. I myself have had a couple of letters published and been responsible for more than a handful of corrections. I've also annoyed at least a half-dozen ombudsmen. So, dammit, I will say my piece!


Anyone still reading? Good. Metro scribe Mike Laris, obviously a nice guy because he called me back when I informed him that his article on the Takoma Park Folk Festival contained an incorrect quote of a sign (see today's paper for the correx), promptly went and wrote another piece about Takoma Park without checking with me first. Mike? Doncha know I'm crazy? That I'll say anything? That this blog is non-remunerative and keeps me from doing real work? 


Let's go through graf by graf

Montgomery neighborhood could have
a powerful grip on county council

By Michael Laris

Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, September 19, 2010

Montgomery County stretches across a diverse terrain of more than 495 square miles. But if political wisdom in the heavily Democratic county holds, four of nine County Council members will live within three miles of one another by year's end.

Actually, it's more than 500 square miles when you take waterways into account.

Three council members already do, right along the Takoma Park-Silver Spring border.
Hans Riemer, a Silver Spring political organizer, joined three neighborhood incumbents in winning Democratic nominations in Tuesday's primary. If the four are victorious come November -- as many assume they will be in a county where registered Democrats outnumber Republicans by more than 2 to 1 -- their tree-lined patch of Montgomery north of the District line will deepen its remarkable grip on local government power. [emphasis added]

Not sure how a "tree-lined patch" can exercise any kind of grip on government power, much less a "remarkable grip." But trees are indeed powerful in Montgomery County.

It would be as if 193 of the House of Representatives' 435 members lived in an area smaller than Connecticut, prompting some in Montgomery to raise questions about fairness and the appearance of favoritism. ["Some" = Two]

Like so many analogies, this one is inapt. There are no "at large" House members. All the seats in the House are based on population. In contrast, many commentators have pondered the wisdom of allowing sparsely populated states (e.g., Wyoming, Utah, Alaska, Montana and Idaho) to have outsized influence in the U.S. Senate. See this post at the Balkinization blog, which notes that 58 senators represent a mere one-fourth of the U.S. population.

"If the voters countywide felt they wanted a different mix of residencies for the at-large members, they had the opportunity to cast their votes as they saw fit," Leventhal said. "Nobody forced them to choose three guys from the same neighborhood."

Who can argue with the ever-tactful George Leventhal? Who wants to? Well, I'll make a mild criticism. The pols in question don't all live in the same "neighborhood," unless you define the "tree-lined patch" stretching 3.1 miles as one neighborhood. In fact, according to the Post's own Real Estate/Neighborhoods web page (which is not very detailed--my neighborhood is not included, for example), Leventhal lives in Brookside Forest, Riemer in North Takoma, Elrich in Kilmarock, and Ervin in South Woodside Park.
On one end of Montgomery's equivalent to Pennsylvania Avenue is Leventhal's midsize home with a fenced yard and a blue-and-white campaign sign out front. On the other end is a two-story brick home across from Sligo Creek Elementary School where Ervin, a former member of the Board of Education, lives. At-Large incumbent Elrich and newcomer Riemer live on side streets along the way.

Along what way? I assume he's equating Piney Branch Road with Pennsylvania Avenue, but he never mentions what street he's talking about. The difference, however, is that Pennsylvania Avenue is best known for the house in the 1600 block, where the President lives. Yet the article doesn't mention Montgomery County Executive Ike Leggett.
On a three-mile walk start to finish through the quartet's base Thursday, few of those headed home from the Takoma Metro station or watching a football practice from the sidelines knew they were in the midst of such a concentration of county authority. And some didn't much care.

I guess that's assuming that three or even four councilmembers can control what the council does. The last four years have shown that is not the case. Not surprisingly, most people questioned did not know and did not care.







View Larger Map  Where the other 5 live



"I have no expectations. Let's put it that way," said Glenn Trivers, a postal carrier watching a helmeted group of kids tackle a yellow dummy at Takoma Park Middle School on Piney Branch Road not far from Leventhal's home. Trivers was among about 20 percent of Montgomery voters who turned out Tuesday. He said he voted for Gov. Martin O'Malley and a school board member whose name sounded familiar but couldn't remember whether he selected any of the council candidates.

But head further along Piney Branch and make a left at the large potholes on the way toward Riemer's house, and there was some recognition of the benefits of living in Montgomery's local corridor of power.


Ah, there's the Piney Branch Road reference (sans "road." Piney Branch is in fact a creek.)


"It's knowing these folks. They live where you live. They understand what issues you have," said Ed Bordley, a federal government lawyer. "You run into them every day, and you feel like you can say, 'How about this issue? What about getting a light down here at the school so the kids can cross Piney Branch Road safely?' " 


Indeed, there is a light at Takoma Middle. But crossing Piney Branch after soccer practice is still a game of chicken.




Bordley, who is blind and was walking home with his German shepherd guide dog, Kaleb, said he loves the location not far from Metro, the tomatoes from his neighbors and the nearby church that serves as his faith-based hub of activism on social issues, which includes promoting affordable housing. And he thinks the nature of the community is such that it wouldn't abuse its outsized influence. "I'd like to think we have the interests of the rest of the county at heart," Bordley said.




But some from elsewhere in Montgomery would prefer a little more geographic power sharing.

"It gives that area a very, very strong voice on the county council," said council member Phil Andrews (D-Gaithersburg/Rockville). 



If they spoke with one voice. I would argue that because they represent the entire county, it's more likely that at-large councilmembers are careful not to bend over backwards to help neighbors.


The political culture of activism in the Takoma Park-Silver Spring area helped the four ride to victory Tuesday, despite the changing trend of where people are living in Montgomery. The county's population center has been creeping northward each decade since 1960 and was in Rockville in 2000, according to county officials. 


Probably true, but since we don't know what the turnout was in downcounty precincts, we have no idea whether the "political culture of activism" propelled them to victory. I also would question whether people in Takoma and Silver Spring are any more "activist" than those in the upcounty, who have had to fight for recognition for years.


Several years ago, Andrews pressed the case for getting rid of at-large districts altogether and dividing the county into nine districts instead. Voters rejected that in a 2004 referendum. 


In other words, the voters didn't agree with Andrews, but he's still whining. OK, that's too flip. Here's an op-ed penned by Andrews and the late Neal Potter, former councilmember and County Executive. He wasn't everyone's cup of tea, but I really loved that man. He did his homework. He cared about the facts. He epitomized good government. Question C, however, lost by more than 75,000 votes, 60.6% to 39.4%.


"A countywide district is huge. It's 1 1/2 times the size of a congressional district, and it's larger than several states" in population, Andrews said, adding that officials would be "closer to the people" with smaller districts. "It's very hard for people who aren't able to raise a lot of money to break into a countywide race." 


Even primary winner Ervin questions the wisdom of the clustering of officialdom. As a strong and early supporter of Riemer, she's partly responsible. But she's had concerns about the appearance and reality of the situation. 


"I really think the best way to govern the county is to have representatives from all the different areas of the county. It's a 500-square-mile jurisdiction," Ervin said. "I don't think it's necessarily a great idea to have so many members of the County Council living in one area. People may feel that area will get special attention." 


Again, do we get special attention? See Takoma rebate, above.

As the council member for District 5, which covers Silver Spring and Takoma Park, Ervin said she's experienced firsthand the confusion of having so much representing going on in one place. It took a while for her, Elrich and Leventhal to stop running into one another, she said. "It got really messy there for a while. Things would happen, and I wouldn't know about it. People would get confused in the community: 'Who do I call? I've got George, I've got Marc, I've got Valerie, and now I've got Hans,' " Ervin said.



It's Montgomery's hybrid political system and a good-government appeal that allowed this to happen.

Instead of having only district council members, as in Prince George's County, or district supervisors and a countywide board chairman, as in Fairfax County, Montgomery reserves four at-large seats under the theory that doing so is a good way to keep a focus on the long view



The current system shapes the tone of debate on difficult issues, such as where to place so-called LULUs, or locally unpopular land uses, said Royce Hanson, the former county planning chairman who lost his council bid Tuesday.

"The district representative knows they are working in a context in which the district view has to adapt to countywide concerns and countywide interests," said Hanson, who has argued against moves to only have district representatives in Montgomery. Such an arrangement would make people "take too parochial a view of things," Hanson said.

Council member Andrews rejected that argument. It hasn't proved true in Fairfax, he said. And by Hanson's logic, Maryland's delegates, senators and congressional representatives should run at-large statewide, Andrews said.

Hanson had another point. Under today's system, each voter can cast ballots for the majority of council members. That's great if you don't like your council member, he said. 



"If you're represented by only one person, where do you go?" Hanson asked. "If you've got a district representative, and you've got four at-large representatives, you've got five avenues to try to influence policy instead of just one."


I got nothin' more folks.

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

Primary 2010 results

Primaries 2010: (Results)


District 20 delegate:
Precincts Reporting  31



                                 Total Votes  24247





El, Elihu Eli                        643       2.65%


Estrada, Robert J.             950  3.92%    


Hixson, Sheila E.             7195     29.67%


Hucker, Tom              6858        28.28%


Mizeur, Heather R.         7200      29.69%

Stoughton, Chris             1401        5.78%


Well, I'm glad that's over.


The most important part of the election season here in Montgomery County -- the Democratic primary -- is done, and all the speculation and teeth-gnashing can end. 


There are a couple of races where folks don't want to concede (0ver the border in D.C., I guess Adrian Fenty had trouble saying goodbye to the trappings of mayoralty), but in general, the results are in and the winners can breathe a sigh of relief while the losers (what a horrible word, how about "the ones with fewer votes") must ponder what-if's and then find something else to do with the rest of their lives.


Chris Stoughton, the 33-year-old policy analyst from Silver Spring who ran for a District 20 delegate's seat, didn't even want to think about campaigning again. He said he'd do it all over again, but certainly didn't look like he could do it all over starting today. 


Tired and dejected, he sat in his Silver Spring apartment with wife Carolina at 1 a.m. after their small group of volunteers had gone and talked about his short-but-energetic campaign that garnered him 1,401 votes out of a total of more than 24,000.


That's almost 6 percent of all the votes, but looked at another way, it means 15-17 percent of the voters who went to the polls in the poorly attended primary backed Stoughton.


Not surprisingly, however, many more exercised their privilege without him in mind.


Still, it was an impressive not a bad showing for a guy who, as he freely and only half-jokingly admitted, "did everything wrong."


He started his campaign too late, running seriously for only three months; he raised almost no money (a couple of thousand dollars); he didn't get endorsements because by the time he got into the race, it was too late; he went after a popular longtime incumbent; he grew up in Indianapolis, not MoCo; and he spoke his mind.


But he also knocked on 7,000 doors (give or take a few). And that's what got him the votes. That, and his wife's and volunteers' persuasive abilities. He was just hoping that the enthusiasm he felt from supporters on Election Day would have translated into more votes.


Stoughton threw a scare into the campaign of longtime Delegate Sheila Hixson, chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee for 17 years and a fixture in Montgomery County politics for more than three decades.


The tension came to a head at a polling place on Tuesday when a Hixson family member got in Stoughton's face and accused him of using "ageist" tactics. Essentially, Stoughton was charged with calling the 76-year-old Hixson "old." (One is reminded of Ronald Reagan's response to a question about the effects of age, that he would not exploit Walter Mondale's youth and inexperience in the 1984 campaign.)


Stoughton said the incident left him "deflated" and wondered aloud whether he had crossed the line during the campaign. No question Stoughton had emphasized Hixson's many years in Annapolis; her age and the length of her tenure at the State House are certainly not secrets, and the Hixson campaign itself stressed that experience while pointing out Stoughton's relative youth and lack of political experience.


But it was a political campaign, after all, and compared to some of the negative campaigning going on in other races, the District 20 affair was a church social.  


The Hixson campaign also didn't take a hands-off approach to Stoughton.  Hixson campign manager Michael Vaughan, for example, took aim at Stoughton on the candidate's own blog, criticizing him for linking reductions in federal aid to states with federal spending on wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
"Hey Chris it sounds like you are running for President and Governor not as a Delegate in Maryland. In Maryland, we have the most powerful governor's office in the country, The governor writes the budget and therefore proposes all funding for all programs. The only thing the House of Delegates can do is cut it. Do you a have a pre-built coalition that you can call on to get any of your proposals enacted. I don't think so."
Indeed, Maryland's budget process is unique. But Stoughton noted that the Legislature still has authority to pass tax reform and increase the alcohol tax; he hammered away at Hixson on the campaign trail for not even trying to raise the liquor levy to fund health care programs.


In the end, Stoughton was glad he ran but is looking forward to a trip to Hawaii for a friend's wedding.  If only he hadn't smashed his surfboard in Costa Rica.


Editor's note: The two other challengers to Hixson, Heather Mizeur and Tom Hucker in District 20 were Robert Jonathan Estrada and Elihu El. Estrada almost cracked the 1,000-vote barrier with 950; El finished with 643. Considering that both ran bare-bones campaigns, their showings also deserve recognition.

Other races


COUNTY COUNCIL AT-LARGE







Precincts Reporting       248








Vote For 4







Total Votes                 252683









de Winter, Jane             14204   







Elrich, Marc              45008   (1)







Evans, Fred                   10372








Floreen, Nancy              36973(3)







Leventhal, George L.     36385 (4)







Narayanan, Raj               8247








Riemer, Hans                38437 (2)







Trachtenberg, Duchy     32505 (5)







Wagner, Rebecca R      30552 (6)





STATE SENATOR 14



     DEM






Precincts Reporting 34







1 seat available








Total Votes 9379








Kramer, Rona E. 4639           49.46%







Montgomery, Karen S. 4740 50.54%








STATE SENATOR 17   
DEM








Precincts Reporting 32







Vote For 1







Total Votes 7352








Forehand, Jennie M. 3830 52.09%







Kagan, Cheryl C. 3522 47.91%








STATE SENATOR 19  (DEM)    

    







Precincts Reporting 36







Vote For 1







Total Votes 10269








Lenett, Mike     4706     45.83%







Manno, Roger   5563     54.17%













State




Images from my polling place -- Grace United Methodist Church, 
7001 New Hampshire Ave., Takoma Park


Politicians at large!



D-20 hopeful Stoughton looks over the shoulders of some Annapolis heavyweights. On the far left
is a county council welterweight whose odds got progressively worse as the "campaign" wore on (update: But guess what? George Leventhal showed you don't need to be warm and fuzzy or get the WaPo's endorsement to win.)

The view from Grace United: Our Lady of Sorrows Catholic Church on Larch Ave.

Farewell

Friday, September 10, 2010

Is there a race in District 20?

Updated Monday, Sept. 13: This will be a very quick update while I gather my thoughts. Beautiful weekend despite the rain; the Folk Festival got better as the day wore on, I think. (easy for me to say, I didn't get there till after 3 p.m. I will be posting some pictures, video and maybe even a faux NPR piece complete with sound effects. But first I need to get out as much election information as I can.)

To wit, I'm glad I  -- and my suffering kids -- walked back home to Poplar Avenue from the Festival, or I wouldn't have run into well-known Green activist-puppeteer-parental adviser to the Piney Branch Young Activist Club (YA) Nadine Bloch. She was handing out information on the Board of Education candidates, about whom it might be said: "Never has so little been known by so many of so few." Nadine's concise little leaflet listed three candidates endorsed by local folks -- specifically Young Activist supporters. The incumbents don't support replacing the polystyrene lunch trays at PBES with plastic ones that can be washed. Nadine also said that Progressive Neighbors, which has endorsed the incumbos, did not follow its own endorsement policy. The YA Facebook page and website has more and I'll get more up later. Prog Neighbors is here My apologies to Mike Tabor for not getting that link up sooner, but I was busy with the Stoughton/Hixson piece. Mike had some good observations about Sheila Hixson which I may be able to relate later today (can't overpromise). I also should send him an email about Nadine's charge along w/ some other info I promised him -- not relating to the primary.

As for the post below, I'll try to add some campaign finance stats and other stuff over on the Politics page. Please check back during the day or become a "follower" so you get regular updates. If you don't whom to vote for, this may be the web site for you. (You can always "un-follow" later if it becomes too much for you.)

[If anyone can tell me how to conclusively eliminate the text background above, lemme know. Blogger isn't that great.]

Lastly, the whole foofaraw over the Voice Q&A's may be a foofaraw with no real foof. Eric told me he didn't even know Sheila Hixson hadn't turned in her answers to the Voice's questions until he started to post them online. The guy had too much to get done by deadline. In any case, the Q&A's that were submitted to the Voice have now been posted on that publication's web site. Of the six candidates, Robert Estrada and Hixson didn't return theirs, which raises the question of why Hixson campaign manager Michael Vaughan would tell me he was going to send it on. Perhaps Vaughan found out later that Voice editor Eric Bond had finally said Hixson never turned hers in. [added Monday: Or maybe Vaughan didn't know himself it hadn't been turned in. Who knows? It is odd, though.]

Chris Stoughton's Q&A is posted at the Voice link above (along w/ Board of Ed questions and answers) and at the Takoma20912 Politics page.




No, say the pundits. The "team" -- Del. Tom Hucker, Sen. Jamie Raskin, and Delegates Heather Mizeur  and Sheila Hixson -- is a sure bet to return to Annapolis and do great things for the District, according to the Conventional Wisdom. Here's Maryland Politics Watch's take on the race, after publishing a summary of the latest campaign finance reports: "All the incumbents will be reelected. Period."


The CW is probably right, but that doesn't mean there is not, technically speaking at least, a race. Nor does it mean voters should be left in the dark about the people running.


But that's pretty much what the local media have done, paying scant attention to the challengers. Yes, the Post and the Gazette have printed their voters' guides (I'd link to the Post's but I can't find it on their web site), but locally, one candidate in particular has been frustrated by the lack of attention, perceiving that the deck is stacked heavily against him.


That candidate would be Chris Stoughton, a 33-year-old policy analyst who arrived late to the race but has been doing everything he can to get his name and ideas to the electorate. In a few short months, he has knocked on 7,000 doors to argue that he should be given a chance to represent the voters of one of the most liberal districts in the state.


In doing so, however, he's stepping on a few toes, including those of Hixson, who began serving in Annapolis two years before Stoughton was even born.


More on Stoughton's campaign pitch in a moment [updated Mon: or not]. But first, an object lesson in how difficult it is to break into politics, especially when you are going up against well-funded, well-known, well-organized incumbents. 


Full disclosure here: Stoughton knocked on my door over the weekend and we spoke in my living room for about half an hour. I was impressed with what he had to say and took one of his signs, which is now in my front yard. At first, I thought I'd give Hixson a pass at the polls, but now I'm not so sure. I plan to vote for Stoughton but don't know which of the three incumbents to leave by the wayside. Maybe I'll do what Hucker was (reportedly) suggesting last time and just vote for one person -- Stoughton -- thus maximizing the power of that one vote. [Update: Hucker says in an e-mail, "I'm not sure who you're talking to, but I didn't tell anyone to bullet vote in 2006, and I haven't ever.  I might still have old lit urging people to vote for three; in any case I know that was part of the verbal rap we trained our volunteers to use at the polls in 2006." ]


But enough about me. Let's turn to ...


The mystery of the missing Q&A's


That would stand for Questions and Answers, the most common device for figuring out whom to vote for -- aside from asking your spouse or that one kooky neighbor who actually follows this stuff.  In the case of District 20, readers of the Takoma Voice would be forgiven for wondering if there's even a race in District 20.


That's because the Voice's September "Election Issue" contained not one word about District 20. That's right, ni siquiera una palabra acerca de la carrera de Distrito 20. Excuse my Spanish, I'm using Google Translate.


Why? Eric Bond, the perpetually overworked and underpaid Takoma Voice editor and publisher, says he didn't have time to get the Q&A's in the paper. But he also hasn't posted them online, where they could be read by potential voters. He told me on Tuesday he would post them by that night. But still, nothing. I offered to post them myself, but he hasn't shared them. he didn't even know Sheila Hixson hadn't turned in her answers to the Voice's questions until he started to post them online, as reported above


Stoughton has. Here is his Q&A, which he says he hustled to finish before the Voice's deadline.   


It's not hard to be sympathetic to Bond, whose newspaper always seems on the verge of folding. A couple of Takoma Park citizens, Voice columnist Howard Kohn and activist and former mayoral candidate Seth Grimes, put together a group called Friends of the Voice last year to help Bond with various debts. The list of contributors to the Voice's continued existence reads like a Who's Who of movers and shakers in Takoma Park --Kohn is on the list, naturally, as is Grimes. But there's also Takoma Park City Council member Dan Robinson (Ward 3), Josh Wright (Ward 1), Reuben Snipper (Ward 5), and Mayor Bruce Williams (along with former mayors Kathy Porter and Ed Sharp). 


Other Voice funders include At-Large County Council members and Takoma residents George Leventhal and Marc Elrich, District 5 council member Valerie Ervin, and, at the state level, District 20 lawmakers Raskin, Hucker and Mizeur (but not Hixson).


We have asked Hixson's campaign twice now for her Voice Q&A but have received no response from Michael Vaughan. Here's hoping we'll get something by email, or that Bond will either post the remaining questions and answers or at least get them to someone who will post them. The election -- there really is one -- is just a few days away.
http://takomapark.patch.com/articles/qa-six-questions-for-chris-stoughton

Update, 6:30 pm Friday: Got some answers to our own questions (as distinguished from Patch's questions and answers and the Voice's, which don't exist) from Hixson spokesman Michael Vaughan. They are posted below. In addition, the Patch web sites have posted "Six questions for Sheila Hixson.""Six questions for Sheila Hixson" Nothing on Stoughton, though. [Updated Monday: Stoughton's is up there  Readers can navigate to the Patch sites for themselves to find Elrich and whoever else they got to turn around a Q&A in less than a week.]

Still true: Still haven't gotten the Voice Q&A from Vaughan but it doesn't appear likely I will anytime soon: Takoma Voice editor Eric Bond told me that "Sheila did not return a questionnaire, so she is not represented. "If she gets one to me, I will make sure to post it.")  The Voice Q&A's are posted at at http://www.takoma.com/tpssnews/2010/09






Takoma20912 Q&A with Hixson campaign

Takoma 20912: Under "endorsements," you list the Takoma/Silver Spring Voice. I saw no endorsement in the latest edition of the paper. Where did that information come from?

Vaughan: That was my fault. I sent my web guy a list of recent endorsments and put the Takoma Voice instead of the Gazette. It has since been corrected.  

Takoma 20912: Second, as I understand it both Del. Hixson and Chris Stoughton filled out Q&A forms for the Voice; they didn't make it into the print edition but might be posted online. Could I get a copy of Del. Hixson's?

Vaughan: I will send that to you later today.  

Takoma20912: Del. Hixson has said she is not in favor of an increase in the tax on beer or liquor. Does she intend to maintain that stance if re-elected, especially given the state's budget woes?

Vaughan: Delegate Hixson is intimately  aware of the financial conditions in the State of Maryland although in relative terms Maryland is in much better shape than most other states. She has said repeatedly on the campaign trail that "everything is on the table" when we look at the  possible  revenue streams for the state.  You may infer from that statement that everything is on the table.       

Takoma20912: Fourth, does the fact that she has received thousands in campaign contributions from the liquor and/or beer industry have any influence on her position on an increase in alcohol taxes?

Vaughan: Delegate Hixson has received money from many individuals and organizations over her career.  She has never traded vote for money and she never will. She has been extremely accessible and everybody get's a fair hearing. 

I would refer you to the recent email sent out by Senator Raskin on behalf of the District 20 team on how he regards Delegate Hixson and her importance to getting a progressive agenda moving forward in Annapolis. You can see a copy of the letter here. www.sheilahixson.org/senatorRaskinLetter/

Takoma20912: Fifth, what is her position on mail delivery of wine (an issue championed by Jamie Raskin)?

Vaughan: Delegate Hixson has not made up her mind finally on this issue but she is always open to reviewing her positions. As I said above "everything is on the table".   There will be a complete review of Maryland Tax policy (which would include the issue of wine by mail order) when the new session starts in January.

This post will be amended and emended till it becomes distended--editor